Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10539 14
Original file (NR10539 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

DIC
Docket No. NR10539-14
7 Apr 15

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) HOMC memo 1910 MMSR-2 dtd 17 Mar 15
(3) Subject’s naval record

1... Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to adjust payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was
discharged.

2. The Board, consisting of ay. 7 ond ip

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

6 April 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. NR10539-14
RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. Petitioner was authorized to receive an increased amount of
separation pay in accordance with FY91 Defense Authorization Act
(Public Law 101-510), enacted on 5 November 1990, providing he agreed
to serve in the Ready Reserve for a period of not less: than 3 years.
Note: On 1 December 1990, Petitioner was discharged for failure of
selection for promotion. and received Separation pay of $30,000.
Furthermore, on 14 June 1999, Petitioner received his Notification of
Entitlement to Retired Pay at Age 60. On 30 September 1999,
Petitioner transferred to the Retired Reserve Awaiting Pay at Age 60.
Finally, on 12 August 2014, he begin receiving retire pay.

b. Note: 10 U.S. Code § 1174(h)1 states the following: “A member
who has received separation pay under this section, or separation pay,
severance pay, or readjustment pay under any other provision of law,
based on service in the armed forces, and who later qualifies for
retired or retainer pay under this title or title 14 shall have
deducted from each payment of such retired or retainer pay an amount,
in such schedule of monthly installments as: the Secretary of Defense
shall specify, taking into account the financial ability‘of the member
to pay and avoiding the imposition of undue financial hardship on the
member and: member’s dependents, until the total amount deducted is
equal to the total amount of separation pay, severance pay, and
readjustment pay so paid.”

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

   

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
Docket No. NR10539-14

(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.

7 Apr 15

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016409

    Original file (20140016409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the remaining portion of separation pay he received in 1988 not be recouped. Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to direct or recommend changes in military records to correct the error or injustice, if persuaded that material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05676-02

    Original file (05676-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC memorandum of 8 August 2002 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). e. In September 1996 the Defense Finance and Accounting Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014019

    Original file (20060014019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he received severance pay in 1990 and he was retired by reason of physical disability on 26 January 2006. While the Board understands the applicant’s concerns, recoupment of separation/severance pay when an individual later qualifies for retired pay or disability compensation is a requirement of law. DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION (DENY) REVIEW AUTHORITY ISSUES 1.128.0800 291/SEV PAY 2.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04631

    Original file (BC-2012-04631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board reviewed the member's personnel record and it appeared that he was not provided the opportunity to make the election to transfer into the ISLRS and was therefore discharged from the TDRL with severance pay. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001588

    Original file (20140001588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) withheld $15,588.84 from her disability pay because of the amount of separation pay on file at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) * the amount of separation pay on record is incorrect * she believes the amount of money paid to her for unused accrued leave was arbitrarily combined with her separation pay and is in error * she does not recall receiving $15,588.84 and this amount plus money for her unused leave...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020511

    Original file (20100020511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The opinion also states the applicant documented on his application that he was ordered to active duty and alluded to an "agreement" that would allow him back on active duty in exchange for a bonus. ALARACT [All Army Activities] Message, dated December 1991, pertaining to voluntary incentive programs states, in pertinent part, Soldiers who receive SSB and who subsequently serve on active duty, Reserve duty in a pay status, or inactive duty for training shall not forfeit any SSB or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009312

    Original file (20070009312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 040301 states that before 15 September 1981, certain provisions of law governing separation from the active list required refund of severance pay upon a member's retirement. Paragraph 040302 states that lump-sum severance pay must be recouped by deducting from retired pay each month an amount based on the service for which the severance pay was received until the total deducted equals the amount of the severance pay. Table 4-2, of the regulation, states, in pertinent part, that a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016889

    Original file (20080016889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he completed over 6 years of active service and was involuntarily separated for the Army's convenience and that according to the regulation he should have been paid separation pay. To be eligible for separation pay and benefits, individuals must have served 6 or more years of active Federal service and had to sign a Department of the Army Form 7154-R (Agreement to Join Ready Reserve) for a period of not less than 3 years. The evidence of record shows that at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010970

    Original file (20090010970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the separation pay he received in 1983 not be recouped. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 15 November 1983 for "failure of selection for permanent promotion" and he received lump-sum separation pay in the amount of $30,000.00. Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013723C070206

    Original file (20050013723C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 November 1999, the applicant was honorably discharged, in the rank/pay grade, Sergeant/E-5, under the provision of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, Chapter 4, at the completion of required active service. On his discharge from the Regular Army, the applicant's DD Form 214 was annotated to show he was honorably discharged; his separation was in accordance with AR 635-200, Chapter 4; the separation code applied to his DD Form 214 was "JBK"; RE Code "3" was entered in its appropriate space...